MediaTek MT8312 vs MediaTek MT8735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8312 vs MediaTek MT8735M, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT8735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like AnTuTu 8, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MT8312 or MT8735M and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8312

MT8735M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8312

24%

MT8735M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8312

MT8735M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8312	MT8735M
Total score	12334	21256
CPU	3453	5948
GPU	4682	8084
MEM	1969	3404
UX	2228	3827

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8312	MT8735M
Single-Core	32	56
Multi-Core	150	259

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8312	MT8735M
Frequency	1300 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	433	533
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312 is 23% better than MT8735M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT8312 has 2 more core than MT8735M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	3.6	17
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1024 x 600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	2.1	6.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	9.7	17.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	5.8	11.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	4.2	9.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	6.9	13.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	21.2
Real Racing 3	7.3	22.8
Sniper 3D	11	25.1
Need for Speed No Limits	9.3	18.2
Mortal Kombat X	8.4	18.2
CSR Racing 2	7	16

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735M is better: 29
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312 specs and review.

MT8735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT8735M specs and review.