Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT8312

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z2520 vs MediaTek MT8312, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-400.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, and how good the processors are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Atom Z2520 or MT8312 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Atom Z2520

MT8312

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Atom Z2520

14%

MT8312

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Atom Z2520

MT8312

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Atom Z2520	MT8312
Total score	11918	12334
CPU	3335	3453
GPU	4536	4682
MEM	1906	1969
UX	2154	2228

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Atom Z2520	MT8312
Single-Core	31	32
Multi-Core	145	150

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Atom Z2520	MT8312
Frequency	1200 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	2	2
Bit	64	32
Lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz Cloverview	2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	433
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8312 is 7% better than Atom Z2520 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	533 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	17.06	3.6
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.2	2.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	9.8	9.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	5.3	5.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	5.9	4.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.7	6.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	11.5
Real Racing 3	9.3	7.3
Sniper 3D	10.1	11
Need for Speed No Limits	9.5	9.3
Mortal Kombat X	6.9	8.4
CSR Racing 2	6.9	7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Intel XMM 7160
Upload speed	6 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 14
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Atom Z2520 and MT8312, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Atom Z2520 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom Z2520 specs and review.

MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8312 specs and review.