Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT8312 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT8312 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT8312 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8312 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9832A is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Octane V2, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT8312 or Spreadtrum SC9832A and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

 
MediaTek MT8312
Spreadtrum SC9832A

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT83121% Spreadtrum SC9832A1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT831224% Spreadtrum SC9832A32%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT83121% Spreadtrum SC9832A1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT8312 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Total score1233423339
CPU34536527
GPU46828868
MEM19693735
UX22284211

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT8312 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Single-Core3262
Multi-Core150285

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT8312 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Frequency1300 MHz1300 MHz
Cores24
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory2 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency433266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT8312 has 2 more core than Spreadtrum SC9832A. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency400 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS3.68.4
# of Cores12
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile2.14.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)9.716.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra5.810.5
Call of Duty: Mobile4.29.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)6.913.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition11.521.5
Real Racing 37.321
Sniper 3D1113.7
Need for Speed No Limits9.316.8
Mortal Kombat X8.416.8
CSR Racing 2714.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution5 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat4
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8312 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832A is better: 27
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8312 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC9832A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT8312 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Spreadtrum SC9832A SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands