MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like 3DMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or Dimensity 1200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

34%

Dimensity 1200

45%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

89%

Dimensity 1200

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

33%

Dimensity 1200

42%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Dimensity 1200
Total score	755955	634362
CPU	211667	177612
GPU	287263	241052
MEM	120958	101498
UX	136072	114189

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Dimensity 1200
Single-Core	1112	1349
Multi-Core	3904	4187

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	Dimensity 1200
Frequency	2500 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	5800 millions
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	4266
Memory bandwidth	48	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	320 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 is 16% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	1856	504
# of Cores	6	9
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.1	28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	89.7	71.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.8	98.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.1	55.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	77.7	61.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	111.6	89.5
Real Racing 3	108.1	197
Sniper 3D	118.2	216.7
Need for Speed No Limits	75.1	157.6
Mortal Kombat X	79.3	157.6
CSR Racing 2	65.9	137.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 20
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 16
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra specs and review.

Dimensity 1200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 1200 specs and review.