Comparisons 14-05-2021
Full comparison data of Mediatek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 900 or Dimensity 1200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 900 | 81% |
Dimensity 1200 | 95% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 900 | 73% |
Dimensity 1200 | 87% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 900 | 74% |
Dimensity 1200 | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 900 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Total score | 489934 | 634362 | | CPU | 135989 | 163368 | | GPU | 116434 | 139627 | | MEM | 88895 | 106600 | | UX | 77760 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 900 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Single-Core | 1049 | 1349 | | Multi-Core | 3464 | 4187 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 900 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 32 KB | | L2 cache | | 320 KB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 is 13% better than Dimensity 900 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MP6 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 684 | 504 | | # of Cores | 24 | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 71.4 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 98.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 55.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 61.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 89.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 197 | | Sniper 3D | | 216.7 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 157.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 157.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 137.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 900 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 32
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
