Comparisons 20-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or Dimensity 1200.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Dimensity 1200 | 95% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Dimensity 1200 | 87% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Dimensity 1200 | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Total score | 801200 | 634362 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Single-Core | 1455 | 1349 | | Multi-Core | 4766 | 4187 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Dimensity 1200 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 320 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 504 | | # of Cores | 9 | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 71.4 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 98.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 55.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 61.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 89.5 | | Real Racing 3 | | 197 | | Sniper 3D | | 216.7 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 157.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 157.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 137.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 11
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
|
