Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 500 or T760 Tanggula.

 
MediaTek Kompanio 500
Unisoc T760 Tanggula

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Kompanio 50014% T760 Tanggula19%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Kompanio 50068% T760 Tanggula80%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Kompanio 50013% T760 Tanggula18%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Kompanio 500 T760 Tanggula
Total score195457276292
CPU5472977358
GPU74271104988
MEM3128044197
UX3519049730

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Kompanio 500 T760 Tanggula
Single-Core298570
Multi-Core11802279

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Kompanio 500 T760 Tanggula
Frequency2000 MHz2200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4xLPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory8 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency16002133
Memory bandwidth1848
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.4-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here T760 Tanggula is 9% better than MediaTek Kompanio 500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G72 MP3Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency800 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS184846
# of Cores36
# of Shader Units
Display2400 x 1080 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile31.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)29.449.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra54.343.5
Call of Duty: Mobile30.138.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)23.445.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition39.664.5
Real Racing 3108.565.5
Sniper 3D86.956.5
Need for Speed No Limits86.252.2
Mortal Kombat X86.963.3
CSR Racing 275.652.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution32 MP64 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemIvy V510 5G
Upload speed1500 MBit/s.
NavigationGlonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T760 Tanggula is better: 30
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
T760 Tanggula SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


T760 Tanggula SoC Comparisons
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands