MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 500 or Dimensity 600 5G.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 500

14%

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 500

68%

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 500

13%

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Dimensity 600 5G
Total score	195457	215034
CPU	54729	60204
GPU	74271	81704
MEM	31280	34403
UX	35190	38700

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Dimensity 600 5G
Single-Core	298	443
Multi-Core	1180	1774

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Dimensity 600 5G
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	8 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	18	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		320 KB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G72 MP3	Mali-G57 MC1
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	184
# of Cores	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		20.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	29.4	40.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	54.3	46.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	30.1	36.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.4	35.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	39.6	50.1
Real Racing 3	108.5	69.6
Sniper 3D	86.9	74.2
Need for Speed No Limits	86.2	55.7
Mortal Kombat X	86.9	67.3
CSR Racing 2	75.6	51

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	240
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		5G Multi-Mode
Upload speed		500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 500 specs and review.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.