|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
|
Comparisons 28-02-2023 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 or MediaTek Kompanio 500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 7c Gen 2 | 17% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 14% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 | 77% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 7c Gen 2 | 15% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Total score | 238247 | 195457 | CPU | 66707 | 54729 | GPU | 90523 | 74271 | MEM | 38109 | 31280 | UX | 42883 | 35190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Single-Core | 602 | 298 | Multi-Core | 1815 | 1180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.5 GHz Kryo 468 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 20 | 18 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 is 19% better than MediaTek Kompanio 500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 452.14 | 184 | # of Cores | | 3 | # of Shader Units | 256 | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 30.6 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.7 | 54.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.6 | 30.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.2 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 35.6 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 83.8 | 108.5 | Sniper 3D | 72.6 | 86.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 100.1 | 86.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 80.2 | 86.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 67.1 | 75.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 255 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X15 LTE modem | | Upload speed | 300 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 11 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Apple A9 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|