 |
Qualcomm QCM2290 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
|
Comparisons 17-02-2023 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm QCM2290 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy QCM2290 or MediaTek Kompanio 500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCM2290 | 5% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 14% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCM2290 | 70% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCM2290 | 2% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM2290 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Total score | 70836 | 195457 | CPU | 19837 | 54729 | GPU | 26918 | 74271 | MEM | 11330 | 31280 | UX | 12757 | 35190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM2290 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Single-Core | 183 | 298 | Multi-Core | 825 | 1180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM2290 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 18 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that QCM2290 has 4 more core than MediaTek Kompanio 500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 184 | # of Cores | | 3 | # of Shader Units | 768 | | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.6 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.2 | 54.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 30.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.1 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.4 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 32.6 | 108.5 | Sniper 3D | 57.1 | 86.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.8 | 86.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.2 | 86.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 36.3 | 75.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 LTE modem | | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS, Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM2290 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 28 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCM2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|