|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
|
Comparisons 28-02-2023 Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs MediaTek Kompanio 500, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 850 or MediaTek Kompanio 500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 850 | 20% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 14% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 850 | 65% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 850 | 19% |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 850 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Total score | 282308 | 195457 | CPU | 79039 | 54729 | GPU | 107274 | 74271 | MEM | 45171 | 31280 | UX | 50815 | 35190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 850 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Single-Core | 638 | 298 | Multi-Core | 2236 | 1180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 850 |
MediaTek Kompanio 500 | Frequency | 2960 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.96 GHz Kryo 385 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 | 18 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 384 KB | | L2 cache | 768 KB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 850 is 32% better than MediaTek Kompanio 500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | 184 | # of Cores | | 3 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.6 | 29.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 44.8 | 54.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.2 | 30.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.4 | 23.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.4 | 39.6 | Real Racing 3 | 56.4 | 108.5 | Sniper 3D | 98.2 | 86.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 62.2 | 86.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 71.4 | 86.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 49.3 | 75.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 280 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem | | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 9 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|