 |
PowerVR GX6250 at 650 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Full compare data of PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy PowerVR GX6250 or Mali-G72 MP3.
PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz vs Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz |
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 3 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm | | Antutu v10 | 79647 | 158380 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 4409 | 5731 | | | | | GFloPS | 83.2 GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 266 MT/s | 117 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.6 GP/s | 3.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 10 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR GX6250 @ 650MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
