 |
Mali-G72 MP3 at 800 MHz vs Adreno 616 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 11-01-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP3 or Adreno 616.
Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz |
Adreno 616 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 158380 | 190434 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 5731 | 6320 | | | | | GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | 459.38 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 117 MT/s | 258 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.6 GP/s | 6.57 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP3 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Adreno 616 @ 500MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
