|
Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|
Comparisons 26-08-2021 Comprehensive compare data of Unisoc T740 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy T740 Tanggula or Snapdragon 662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT740 Tanggula | 17% |
Snapdragon 662 | 13% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T740 Tanggula | 68% |
Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT740 Tanggula | 15% |
Snapdragon 662 | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T740 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Total score | 243859 | 182816 | CPU | 68270 | 51179 | GPU | 92672 | 69479 | MEM | 39021 | 29244 | UX | 43885 | 32900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T740 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Single-Core | 503 | 374 | Multi-Core | 2012 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T740 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GM 9446 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 204 | 312 | # of Cores | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | 24.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 32.1 | 29.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.3 | 61.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.2 | 32.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 24.1 | 25.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 37.1 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 72.6 | 92.3 | Sniper 3D | 93.6 | 98.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.4 | 86.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 93.2 | 80 | CSR Racing 2 | 69.3 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 750 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T740 Tanggula is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 12 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T740 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 662 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|