|
Snapdragon 750G vs Snapdragon 662 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 619 and Adreno 610. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 750G is octa-core (Kryo 570) and Snapdragon 662 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 750G or Snapdragon 662 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 750G | 23% |
Snapdragon 662 | 13% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 750G | 76% |
Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 750G | 21% |
Snapdragon 662 | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 750G |
Snapdragon 662 | Total score | 324969 | 182816 | CPU | 90989 | 51179 | GPU | 123496 | 69479 | MEM | 51999 | 29244 | UX | 58484 | 32900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 750G |
Snapdragon 662 | Single-Core | 727 | 374 | Multi-Core | 2475 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 750G |
Snapdragon 662 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 750G is 9% better than Snapdragon 662 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | 312 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 320 | 192 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.4 | 24.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 57.7 | 29.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 62.9 | 61.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.6 | 32.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 50.7 | 25.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 77.8 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 110.1 | 92.3 | Sniper 3D | 138.4 | 98.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 75.5 | 86.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 100.6 | 80 | CSR Racing 2 | 69.2 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10, HLG | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1200 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 2 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 662, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 750G SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Snapdragon 662 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|