|
Unisoc T760 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|
Comparisons 26-08-2021 Full comparison data of Unisoc T760 Tanggula vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy T760 Tanggula or Snapdragon 662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT760 Tanggula | 19% |
Snapdragon 662 | 13% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T760 Tanggula | 80% |
Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT760 Tanggula | 18% |
Snapdragon 662 | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T760 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Total score | 276292 | 182816 | CPU | 77358 | 51179 | GPU | 104988 | 69479 | MEM | 44197 | 29244 | UX | 49730 | 32900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T760 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Single-Core | 570 | 374 | Multi-Core | 2279 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T760 Tanggula |
Snapdragon 662 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here T760 Tanggula is 9% better than Snapdragon 662 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP6 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 846 | 312 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 31.7 | 24.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 49.4 | 29.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 43.5 | 61.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.3 | 32.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.4 | 25.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 64.5 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 65.5 | 92.3 | Sniper 3D | 56.5 | 98.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 52.2 | 86.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.3 | 80 | CSR Racing 2 | 52.3 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T760 Tanggula is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 9 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T760 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
Snapdragon 662 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|