Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Adreno 610.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T710 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 662 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tiger T710 or Snapdragon 662 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tiger T710

18%

Snapdragon 662

13%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tiger T710

64%

Snapdragon 662

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tiger T710

17%

Snapdragon 662

10%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 662
Total score	256330	182816
CPU	71765	51179
GPU	97406	69479
MEM	41022	29244
UX	46147	32900

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 662
Single-Core	563	374
Multi-Core	2030	1573

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tiger T710	Snapdragon 662
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1866/933
Memory bandwidth	29	13.91
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GM 9446	Adreno 610
GPU Frequency	970 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	247.35	312
# of Cores	3
# of Shader Units		192
Display	2160 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.3	24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	45.5	29.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	39.1	61.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	35.7	32.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	41.1	25.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	58.1	35.2
Real Racing 3	68.4	92.3
Sniper 3D	50.8	98.4
Need for Speed No Limits	70.4	86.1
Mortal Kombat X	45	80
CSR Racing 2	50.8	86.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Vivi Magic	Qualcomm Spectra 340T
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-7	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	390 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T710 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 13
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Tiger T710 and Snapdragon 662, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Tiger T710 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T710 specs and review.

Snapdragon 662 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 662 specs and review.