|
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Adreno 610. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio G35 is octa-core (Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 662 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like AnTuTu, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, Octane V2, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Helio G35 or Snapdragon 662 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio G35 | 7% |
Snapdragon 662 | 13% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio G35 | 66% |
Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio G35 | 5% |
Snapdragon 662 | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio G35 |
Snapdragon 662 | Total score | 110404 | 182816 | CPU | 30918 | 51179 | GPU | 41961 | 69479 | MEM | 17655 | 29244 | UX | 19881 | 32900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio G35 |
Snapdragon 662 | Single-Core | 225 | 374 | Multi-Core | 993 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio G35 |
Snapdragon 662 | Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio G35 is 13% better than Snapdragon 662 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 312 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 24.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.6 | 29.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 42.2 | 61.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.5 | 32.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 21.6 | 25.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.8 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 84.4 | 92.3 | Sniper 3D | 92.8 | 98.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 76 | 86.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 48.5 | 80 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.6 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G35 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 29 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio G35 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Snapdragon 662 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|