|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 880 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 880, compare of GPUs Adreno 610 and Mali-G76 MP5. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240) and Exynos 880 is octa-core (Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, 3DMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 460 or Exynos 880 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 460 | 10% |
Exynos 880 | 14% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 460 | 69% |
Exynos 880 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 460 | 8% |
Exynos 880 | 12% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 460 |
Exynos 880 | Total score | 142955 | 198613 | CPU | 40022 | 55616 | GPU | 54316 | 75467 | MEM | 22868 | 31778 | UX | 25725 | 35758 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 460 |
Exynos 880 | Single-Core | 292 | 2 | Multi-Core | 1286 | 1709 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 460 |
Exynos 880 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 6x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 13.91 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 880 is 9% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MP5 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 312 | 217 | # of Cores | | 4 | # of Shader Units | 192 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 29.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 28.8 | 48.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 40.1 | 56.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.8 | 38.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 27.4 | 41.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 40.2 | 64.5 | Real Racing 3 | 70.2 | 85.4 | Sniper 3D | 88.2 | 91 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.2 | 102.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 64.2 | 82.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 48.1 | 74 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 340 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | 5G NR Sub, LTE Cat.16 5CA/Cat.18 2CA | Download speed | 390 MBit/s. | 3550 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 1380 MBit/s. | Navigation | GLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 880 is better: 25 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Snapdragon 460 and Exynos 880, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Exynos 880 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
| |
|