 |
Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 |
|
Comparisons 17-02-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Antutu v10, 9, and how good the chipsets are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy QCM2290 or Snapdragon 460.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCM2290 | 5% |
Snapdragon 460 | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCM2290 | 70% |
Snapdragon 460 | 69% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCM2290 | 2% |
Snapdragon 460 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM2290 |
Snapdragon 460 | Total score | 70836 | 142955 | CPU | 19837 | 40022 | GPU | 26918 | 54316 | MEM | 11330 | 22868 | UX | 12757 | 25725 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM2290 |
Snapdragon 460 | Single-Core | 183 | 292 | Multi-Core | 825 | 1286 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM2290 |
Snapdragon 460 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM2290 is 9% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCM2290 has 4 more core than Snapdragon 460. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 312 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 768 | 192 | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.6 | 28.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.2 | 40.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 37.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.1 | 27.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.4 | 40.2 | Real Racing 3 | 32.6 | 70.2 | Sniper 3D | 57.1 | 88.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.8 | 72.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.2 | 64.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 36.3 | 48.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 340 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 LTE modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS, Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS | GLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM2290 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCM2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Apple A9 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|