Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895, comparison of GPUs Mali-G71 MP20 and Adreno 610.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240) and Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Geekbench, Octane V2, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 460 or Exynos 9 Octa 8895 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 460

10%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

12%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 460

69%

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 460

Exynos 9 Octa 8895

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 460	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Total score	142955	176074
CPU	40022	49309
GPU	54316	66905
MEM	22868	28174
UX	25725	31689

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 460	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Single-Core	292	488
Multi-Core	1286	1515

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 460	Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Frequency	1800 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	11 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	3 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	13.91	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		64 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is 21% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 610	Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	546 MHz
GFloPS	312	371.2
# of Cores		20
# of Shader Units	192
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		23.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.8	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	40.1	58.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	37.8	30.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	27.4	24.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	40.2	33.5
Real Racing 3	70.2	73.5
Sniper 3D	88.2	94.1
Need for Speed No Limits	72.2	82.3
Mortal Kombat X	64.2	94.1
CSR Racing 2	48.1	82.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 340
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem	LTE Cat.13/16 2/5 CA
Download speed	390 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 460 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 460 specs and review.

Exynos 9 Octa 8895 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 9 Octa 8895 specs and review.