Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 980 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 980

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 980, comparison of GPUs Mali-G76 MP5 and Adreno 610.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240) and Exynos 980 is octa-core (Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Real Racing 3, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 460 or Exynos 980 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.


 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Samsung Exynos 980

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 46010% Exynos 98017%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 46069% Exynos 98072%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 4608% Exynos 98016%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 460 Exynos 980
Total score142955236563
CPU4002266232
GPU5431689891
MEM2286837840
UX2572542582

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 460 Exynos 980
Single-Core292487
Multi-Core12861951

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 460 Exynos 980
Frequency1800 MHz2200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography11 nm8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x1.8 GHz Kryo 2402x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)3 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661866
Memory bandwidth13.91
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.3-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 980 is 18% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G76 MP5
GPU Frequency750 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS312217
# of Cores4
# of Shader Units192
Display2520 x 1080 pixels3360 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)28.830.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra40.156.9
Call of Duty: Mobile37.837.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)27.423.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition40.235.1
Real Racing 370.271.1
Sniper 3D88.2108.1
Need for Speed No Limits72.2102.4
Mortal Kombat X64.291
CSR Racing 248.168.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution48 MP108 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 340
Video Encoding FPS60120
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem5G NR Sub, LTE Cat.16 5CA/Cat.18 2CA
Download speed390 MBit/s.2055 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.1280 MBit/s.
NavigationGLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 980 is better: 25
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 460 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Exynos 980 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562


Exynos 980 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands