 |
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i5-11400H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i5-11400H and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, RealBench, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Furmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11400H or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i5-11400H | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 6% better than Core i5-11400H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i5-11400H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 117.7 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 102.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 88.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 54.5 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 97.7 | 90.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i5-11400H | 128% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11400H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-11400H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 185 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 1772 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 433 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 3970 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1129 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 10508 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-11400H | | Single-Core | 1564 | 2516 | | Multi-Core | 32503 | 19173 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-11400H | | Single-Core | 1907 | 1733 | | Multi-Core | 15235 | 7844 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i5-11400H | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | June 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1787 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.7 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 6 | | Threads | 20 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 34% better than Core i5-11400H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13905H has 8 more core than Core i5-11400H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11400H is better: 3
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i5-11400H before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-11400H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
