 |
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-12900HK |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-12900HK and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Furmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, AIDA64, 3DMark, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900HK or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-12900HK | 66% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900HK is 10% better than Core i9-13905H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-12900HK | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 100.7 | | Valorant | 117.7 | 114.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 64.1 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 107.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 85.8 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 92.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 78.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 57.2 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 89.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 96.1 | | Valheim | 97.7 | 94.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-12900HK | 141% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-12900HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 479 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 5047 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 800 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 11221 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 2838 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 32291 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-12900HK | | Single-Core | 1564 | 7395 | | Multi-Core | 32503 | 55205 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-12900HK | | Single-Core | 1907 | 1916 | | Multi-Core | 15235 | 12420 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-12900HK | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 14 | | Threads | 20 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 108 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 7% better than Core i9-12900HK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900HK is better: 9
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-12900HK before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-12900HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
