|
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-11980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-11980HK tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like RealBench, Handbrake, Prime95, SuperPi, Blender, PassMark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11980HK or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-11980HK | 58% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 1% better than Core i9-11980HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-11980HK | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 98.4 | Valorant | 117.7 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 83.9 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 90.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 77.2 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 55.9 | Warzone | 91.8 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 93.9 | Valheim | 97.7 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-11980HK | 82% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-11980HK as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 298 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 2704 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 668 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 6009 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1735 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 17294 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 1564 | 3989 | Multi-Core | 32503 | 29565 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 1907 | 1599 | Multi-Core | 15235 | 10219 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | February 21, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 19% better than Core i9-11980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13905H has 6 more core than Core i9-11980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11980HK is better: 5 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-11980HK before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-11980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|