|
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-13950HX tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Handbrake, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 3DMark, Gears 5, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13950HX or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-13950HX | 64% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13950HX is 7% better than Core i9-13905H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-13950HX | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 112.9 | Valorant | 117.7 | 128.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 71.9 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 120.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 96.2 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 103.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 88.5 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 64.2 | Warzone | 91.8 | 100.1 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 107.8 | Valheim | 97.7 | 106.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-13950HX | 124% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13950HX since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13950HX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 446 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 4439 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 726 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 9835 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 2507 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 28251 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13950HX | Single-Core | 1564 | 2295 | Multi-Core | 32503 | 48131 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13950HX | Single-Core | 1907 | 2423 | Multi-Core | 15235 | 24434 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13950HX | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | November 12, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5.6 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 14 | 24 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 24 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 68 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 17% better than Core i9-13950HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13950HX has 10 more core than Core i9-13905H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13950HX is better: 28 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-13950HX before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-13950HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H
| |
|