 |
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-11950H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-11950H tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Blender, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, 7zip, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11950H or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-11950H | 58% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 1% better than Core i9-11950H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-11950H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Control, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 94.6 | | Valorant | 117.7 | 107.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 60.2 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 101.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 80.6 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 87.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 74.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 83.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 90.3 | | Valheim | 97.7 | 89.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-11950H | 67% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-11950H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11950H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 287 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 2600 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 642 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 5778 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1668 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 16629 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11950H | | Single-Core | 1564 | 3836 | | Multi-Core | 32503 | 28428 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11950H | | Single-Core | 1907 | 1324 | | Multi-Core | 15235 | 6454 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-11950H | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | February 21, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1787 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 19% better than Core i9-11950H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13905H has 6 more core than Core i9-11950H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11950H is better: 4
Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-11950H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-11950H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
