 |
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-13900HX |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-13900HX and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Handbrake, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, 7zip, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, PassMark, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Furmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900HX or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-13900HX | 62% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900HX is 4% better than Core i9-13905H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-13900HX | 62% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 109.6 | | Valorant | 117.7 | 124.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 69.7 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 117.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 93.4 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 100.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 85.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 62.3 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 97.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 104.6 | | Valheim | 97.7 | 103.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-13900HX | 116% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900HX since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 60W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13900HX | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 386 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 3847 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 629 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 8525 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 2172 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 24488 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13900HX | | Single-Core | 1564 | 1988 | | Multi-Core | 32503 | 41721 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13900HX | | Single-Core | 1907 | 2100 | | Multi-Core | 15235 | 21180 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-13900HX | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | November 12, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5.4 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 24 | | Threads | 20 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 60 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 36 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 21% better than Core i9-13900HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900HX has 10 more core than Core i9-13905H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900HX is better: 26
All the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-13900HX before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-13900HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
|
|
|
