 |
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-12900T |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-12900T and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like RealBench, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 7zip, AIDA64, PassMark, Prime95, Gears 5, Furmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Handbrake, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Blender, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900T or Intel Core i5-13600KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13600KF | 63% |
Core i9-12900T | 65% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900T is 3% better than Core i5-13600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13600KF | 58% |
Core i9-12900T | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.3 | 104.0 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 118.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 66.2 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 111.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 88.7 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 95.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 81.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 59.1 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 92.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 99.3 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 98.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13600KF | 45% |
Core i9-12900T | 175% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600KF since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 390 | 436 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4188 | 4593 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 658 | 728 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9322 | 10212 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2352 | 2582 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26841 | 29385 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Single-Core | 2148 | 6730 | | Multi-Core | 45756 | 50237 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Single-Core | 1721 | 1847 | | Multi-Core | 13972 | 15707 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | July 21, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 16 | | Threads | 20 | 24 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 7% better than Core i9-12900T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900T has 2 more core than Core i5-13600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900T is better: 25
Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600KF and Intel Core i9-12900T before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-12900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
|
|
|
