Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7643 gaming benchmark

Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7643

Processor comparisons   29-09-2022
   You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7643 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Geekbench 5.2, WPrime, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 7zip, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Fallout 76
  • Valorant
  • Apex Legends
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Valheim
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Last Man Standing
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Overwatch
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Fortnite
  • Death Stranding
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Halo Infinite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Watch Dogs Legion

   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7643 or Intel Core i5-13600KF.


 
Intel Core i5-13600KF
AMD EPYC 7643

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600KF75% EPYC 764375%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i5-13600KF71% EPYC 764380%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite126.3142.2
Valorant143.6161.6
Cyberpunk 207780.490.5
Apex Legends134.9151.9
Call of Duty Warzone107.7121.2
Overwatch116.3130.9
Red Dead Redemption 299.1111.5
DOOM Eternal71.880.8
Warzone112.0126.0
Assassin's Creed120.6135.7
Valheim119.2134.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i5-13600KF83% EPYC 764318%
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600KF is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7643 since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7643
Cinbench 15 Single-core479166
Cinbench 15 Multi-core50556845
Cinbench 20 Single-core802312
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1124114509
Cinbench 23 Single-core2843767
Cinbench 23 Multi-core3234837728

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7643
Single-Core25981615
Multi-Core5513755343

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7643
Single-Core31201222
Multi-Core2480135055

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7643
Announcement dateDecember 10, 2022March 15, 2021
TypeDesktopServer
SocketFCLGA1700SP3
Core nameRaptor LakeMilan
Architecturex86Zen 3
Generation133
Turbo Frequency5.1 MHz3.6 MHz
Frequency3.9 MHz2.3 MHz
Cores1448
Threads2096
Bus rate16 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count14200 millions76000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)125 W225 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4
Max. Memory128 Gb
Memory Frequency65003200
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s
L1 cache2 MB
L2 cache8 MB
L3 cache24 MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000326
100-100000326WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 41% better than EPYC 7643 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7643 has 34 more core than Core i5-13600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7643 is better: 20
   Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD EPYC 7643 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600KF - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score
AMD EPYC 7643 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7700X
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600


AMD EPYC 7643 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands