 |
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-12900T |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-12900T tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Handbrake, PassMark, MATLAB, Prime95, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PCMark 10.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900T or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i9-12900T | 65% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900T is 9% better than Core i3-13300. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i9-12900T | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 104.0 | | Valorant | 109.4 | 118.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 66.2 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 111.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 88.7 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 95.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 81.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 59.1 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 92.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 99.3 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 98.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i9-12900T | 175% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900T is more energy efficient than the Core i3-13300 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 436 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 4593 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 728 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 10212 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 2582 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 29385 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Single-Core | 1479 | 6730 | | Multi-Core | 30781 | 50237 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Single-Core | 1858 | 1847 | | Multi-Core | 8100 | 15707 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-12900T | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 21, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 16 | | Threads | 12 | 24 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 12600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900T is 16% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900T has 8 more core than Core i3-13300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900T is better: 32
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i9-12900T before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-12900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
|
|
|
