Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7663 gaming benchmark

Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7663

Processor comparisons   29-09-2022
   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7663 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 7zip, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, MATLAB, SuperPi, Blender, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Blender, PassMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Borderlands 3
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Valorant
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Last Man Standing
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Valheim
  • Death Stranding
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Fortnite
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Halo Infinite
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Apex Legends
  • Fallout 76

   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or Intel Core i5-13600KF.


 
Intel Core i5-13600KF
AMD EPYC 7663

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600KF63% EPYC 766368%
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 7% better than Core i5-13600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i5-13600KF58% EPYC 766376%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite102.3135.1
Valorant116.2153.5
Cyberpunk 207765.186.0
Apex Legends109.2144.3
Call of Duty Warzone87.1115.1
Overwatch94.1124.3
Red Dead Redemption 280.2105.9
DOOM Eternal58.176.8
Warzone90.6119.7
Assassin's Creed97.6128.9
Valheim96.4127.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i5-13600KF45% EPYC 766312%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600KF is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7663
Cinbench 15 Single-core390184
Cinbench 15 Multi-core41887606
Cinbench 20 Single-core658347
Cinbench 20 Multi-core932216121
Cinbench 23 Single-core2352852
Cinbench 23 Multi-core2684141920

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7663
Single-Core21481794
Multi-Core4575661492

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7663
Single-Core1721874
Multi-Core1397246160

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

Intel Core i5-13600KF AMD EPYC 7663
Announcement dateDecember 10, 2022March 15, 2021
TypeDesktopServer
SocketFCLGA1700SP3
Core nameRaptor LakeMilan
Architecturex86Zen 3
Generation133
Turbo Frequency5.1 MHz3.5 MHz
Frequency3.9 MHz2 MHz
Cores1456
Threads20112
Bus rate16 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count14200 millions78000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)125 W240 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4
Max. Memory128 Gb
Memory Frequency65003200
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s
L1 cache2 MB
L2 cache8 MB
L3 cache24 MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000318
100-100000318WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 48% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 42 more core than Core i5-13600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 20
   However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600KF - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7663 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D


AMD EPYC 7663 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands