|
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-10900 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-10900 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Handbrake, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900 or Intel Core i5-13600KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600KF | 63% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600KF is 11% better than Core i9-10900. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600KF | 58% |
Core i9-10900 | 56% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 102.3 | 99.0 | Valorant | 116.2 | 112.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 63.0 | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 105.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 84.4 | Overwatch | 94.1 | 91.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 77.6 | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 56.2 | Warzone | 90.6 | 87.7 | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 94.5 | Valheim | 96.4 | 93.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600KF | 45% |
Core i9-10900 | 64% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600KF since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 390 | 231 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4188 | 2541 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 658 | 529 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9322 | 6378 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2352 | 1367 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26841 | 14816 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Single-Core | 2148 | 3126 | Multi-Core | 45756 | 21216 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Single-Core | 1721 | 1265 | Multi-Core | 13972 | 10761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-10900 | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 10 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 28% better than Core i9-10900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600KF has 4 more core than Core i9-10900. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900 is better: 4 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600KF and Intel Core i9-10900 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10900 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|