 |
Apple M1 Ultra vs Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Apple M1 Ultra vs Intel Core i5-13600KF and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, PCMark 10, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Blender, Furmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Prime95, AIDA64, WPrime, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13600KF or Apple M1 Ultra.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Ultra | 68% |
Core i5-13600KF | 63% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 7% better than Core i5-13600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Ultra | 64% |
Core i5-13600KF | 58% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.1 | 102.3 | Valorant | 128.6 | 116.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 65.1 | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 109.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 87.1 | Overwatch | 104.1 | 94.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 80.2 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 58.1 | Warzone | 100.3 | 90.6 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 97.6 | Valheim | 106.7 | 96.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Ultra | 272% |
Core i5-13600KF | 45% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600KF as it consumes less power: 20W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 555 | 390 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3252 | 4188 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1103 | 658 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5583 | 9322 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 4240 | 2352 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21959 | 26841 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Single-Core | 9611 | 2148 | Multi-Core | 62194 | 45756 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Single-Core | 1637 | 1721 | Multi-Core | 24642 | 13972 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Announcement date | April 09, 2022 | December 10, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | M1 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Raptor Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 20 | 14 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 114000 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 125 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 818 GByte/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 48MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 96MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | APL1W06 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 17% better than M1 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Ultra has 6 more core than Core i5-13600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 13 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M1 Ultra and Intel Core i5-13600KF before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|