|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Intel Core i9-12900T |
|
Processor comparisons 30-08-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Intel Core i9-12900T and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, Gears 5, 7zip, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900T or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 74% |
Core i9-12900T | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 12% better than Core i9-12900T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 61% |
Core i9-12900T | 59% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.7 | 104.0 | Valorant | 123.5 | 118.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.1 | 66.2 | Apex Legends | 116.1 | 111.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.6 | 88.7 | Overwatch | 100.0 | 95.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.2 | 81.6 | DOOM Eternal | 61.7 | 59.1 | Warzone | 96.3 | 92.2 | Assassin's Creed | 103.7 | 99.3 | Valheim | 102.5 | 98.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 16% |
Core i9-12900T | 175% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
Intel Core i9-12900T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 195 | 436 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 10553 | 4593 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 728 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 22406 | 10212 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1123 | 2582 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 67074 | 29385 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
Intel Core i9-12900T | Single-Core | 2460 | 6730 | Multi-Core | 81681 | 50237 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
Intel Core i9-12900T | Single-Core | 1350 | 1847 | Multi-Core | 20255 | 15707 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
Intel Core i9-12900T | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | sWRX8 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Alder Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 24 | 16 | Threads | 48 | 24 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 32MB | 12 MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000446WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 5% better than Core i9-12900T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more core than Core i9-12900T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900T is better: 13 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Intel Core i9-12900T before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Intel Core i9-12900T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
| |
|