|
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-11980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13600KF vs Intel Core i9-11980HK tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, PCMark 10, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, 3DMark, MATLAB, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Prime95, RealBench. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11980HK or Intel Core i5-13600KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600KF | 63% |
Core i9-11980HK | 58% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600KF is 7% better than Core i9-11980HK. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600KF | 58% |
Core i9-11980HK | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 102.3 | 98.4 | Valorant | 116.2 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 83.9 | Overwatch | 94.1 | 90.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 77.2 | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 55.9 | Warzone | 90.6 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 93.9 | Valheim | 96.4 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600KF | 45% |
Core i9-11980HK | 82% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-11980HK is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600KF as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 390 | 298 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4188 | 2704 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 658 | 668 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9322 | 6009 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2352 | 1735 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26841 | 17294 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 2148 | 3989 | Multi-Core | 45756 | 29565 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 1721 | 1599 | Multi-Core | 13972 | 10219 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | February 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 15% better than Core i9-11980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600KF has 6 more core than Core i9-11980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11980HK is better: 4 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600KF and Intel Core i9-11980HK before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-11980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|