|
Apple M1 Max vs Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Apple M1 Max vs Intel Core i5-13600KF tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like RealBench, Handbrake, Prime95, SuperPi, Blender, PassMark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13600KF or Apple M1 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Max | 60% |
Core i5-13600KF | 63% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600KF is 4% better than M1 Max. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Max | 57% |
Core i5-13600KF | 58% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.3 | 102.3 | Valorant | 115.1 | 116.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 65.1 | Apex Legends | 108.2 | 109.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.3 | 87.1 | Overwatch | 93.2 | 94.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.4 | 80.2 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 58.1 | Warzone | 89.8 | 90.6 | Assassin's Creed | 96.7 | 97.6 | Valheim | 95.5 | 96.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Max | 332% |
Core i5-13600KF | 45% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13600KF since it has less power consumption: 18W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 390 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1811 | 4188 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 617 | 658 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3106 | 9322 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2360 | 2352 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12204 | 26841 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Single-Core | 5344 | 2148 | Multi-Core | 34572 | 45756 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Single-Core | 1793 | 1721 | Multi-Core | 13028 | 13972 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Apple M1 Max |
Intel Core i5-13600KF | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | December 10, 2022 | Type | Laptop;Desktop | Desktop | Socket | M1 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Raptor Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 10 | 14 | Threads | 10 | 20 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 57000 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 18 W | 125 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 409 GByte/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 24MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 48MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | APL1105 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 17% better than M1 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600KF has 4 more core than M1 Max. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 30 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M1 Max and Intel Core i5-13600KF before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|