 |
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-9600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-9600KF and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Blender, RealBench, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, WPrime, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Furmark, MATLAB, Handbrake, Prime95, Blender, Dolphin Emulator.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9600KF or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i5-9600KF | 53% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 10% better than Core i5-9600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i5-9600KF | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 94.5 | | Valorant | 109.5 | 107.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 60.1 | | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 101.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 80.5 | | Overwatch | 88.7 | 87.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 74.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 85.4 | 83.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 90.2 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 89.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i5-9600KF | 48% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9600KF since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 95W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9600KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1165 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 475 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 2643 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1276 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 7301 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9600KF | | Single-Core | 1492 | 2834 | | Multi-Core | 31087 | 10887 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9600KF | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1395 | | Multi-Core | 8179 | 6382 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9600KF | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 6 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 7600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 95 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 9 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9600KF is 18% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 2 more core than Core i5-9600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9600KF is better: 5
Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i5-9600KF before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-9600KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
