 |
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-9500F |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-9500F and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Blender, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Prime95, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Furmark, SuperPi, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9500F or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i5-9500F | 53% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 10% better than Core i5-9500F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i5-9500F | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 109.5 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 100.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 88.7 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 85.4 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i5-9500F | 61% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9500F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9500F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 182 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 371 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 2640 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 916 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 6283 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9500F | | Single-Core | 1492 | 2716 | | Multi-Core | 31087 | 10325 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9500F | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1197 | | Multi-Core | 8179 | 5556 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-9500F | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 6 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 3600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 9 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 2 more core than Core i5-9500F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9500F is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i5-9500F before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-9500F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
|
|
|
