 |
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i9-10900KF and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Prime95, 7zip, MATLAB, PassMark, Gears 5, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900KF or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 3% better than Core i9-10900KF. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 109.5 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 88.7 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 85.4 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i9-10900KF | 39% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900KF as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 234 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 2677 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 539 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 6399 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1418 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 17325 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1492 | 3105 | | Multi-Core | 31087 | 23797 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1471 | | Multi-Core | 8179 | 13125 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 10 | | Threads | 12 | 20 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900KF is 18% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900KF has 2 more core than Core i3-13300F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900KF is better: 22
Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i9-10900KF before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10900KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
