|
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-10500 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-10500 and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10500 or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 8% better than Core i5-10500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 95.4 | Valorant | 109.5 | 108.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 60.7 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 101.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 81.3 | Overwatch | 88.7 | 87.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 74.8 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 54.2 | Warzone | 85.4 | 84.5 | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 91.0 | Valheim | 90.9 | 90.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i5-10500 | 61% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10500 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 201 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1491 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 467 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 3392 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1082 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 8209 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Single-Core | 1492 | 2743 | Multi-Core | 31087 | 13414 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Single-Core | 1875 | 1196 | Multi-Core | 8179 | 7233 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10500 is 3% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 2 more core than Core i5-10500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10500 is better: 5 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i5-10500 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-10500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|