 |
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i3-8300 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i3-8300 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, Handbrake, 3DMark, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Furmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, RealBench.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8300 or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i3-8300 | 51% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 13% better than Core i3-8300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i3-8300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 91.8 | | Valorant | 109.5 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 88.7 | 84.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 85.4 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i3-8300 | 60% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8300 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 62W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 158 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 633 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 409 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 1499 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 807 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 3131 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1492 | 2288 | | Multi-Core | 31087 | 6264 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1119 | | Multi-Core | 8179 | 3754 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 4 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 62 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300 is 18% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 4 more core than Core i3-8300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300 is better: 6
However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i3-8300 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-8300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-7500
|
|
|
