 |
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i3-10105F |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i3-10105F and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Blender, 3DMark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Handbrake, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10105F or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i3-10105F | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 11% better than Core i3-10105F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i3-10105F | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 92.8 | | Valorant | 109.5 | 105.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 59.1 | | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 99.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 79.1 | | Overwatch | 88.7 | 85.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 72.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.7 | | Warzone | 85.4 | 82.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 88.6 | | Valheim | 90.9 | 87.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i3-10105F | 60% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10105F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-10105F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 191 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1001 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 447 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 2284 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1143 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 4441 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-10105F | | Single-Core | 1492 | 2617 | | Multi-Core | 31087 | 8868 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-10105F | | Single-Core | 1875 | 1172 | | Multi-Core | 8179 | 4732 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i3-10105F | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10105F is 18% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 4 more core than Core i3-10105F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105F is better: 5
All the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i3-10105F before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-10105F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-7100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
