|
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i7-6700 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i7-6700 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as SuperPi, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, Blender, RealBench, Blender, 3DMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, Furmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700 or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 11% better than Core i7-6700. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 92.4 | Valorant | 109.5 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 88.7 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.5 | Warzone | 85.4 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 88.2 | Valheim | 90.9 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i7-6700 | 56% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 171 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 816 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 1774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1071 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 4921 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 1492 | 2325 | Multi-Core | 31087 | 8025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 1875 | 1095 | Multi-Core | 8179 | 4353 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Threads | 12 | 8 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6700 is 11% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 4 more core than Core i7-6700. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700 is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i7-6700 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-6700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
| |
|