|
Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-10400 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-13300F vs Intel Core i5-10400 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, SuperPi, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10400 or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 10% better than Core i5-10400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 94.8 | Valorant | 109.5 | 107.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 60.3 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 101.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 80.8 | Overwatch | 88.7 | 87.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 74.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 53.9 | Warzone | 85.4 | 84.0 | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 90.5 | Valheim | 90.9 | 89.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Core i5-10400 | 63% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10400 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 190 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1341 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 450 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 3197 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 1110 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 7610 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 1492 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 31087 | 12503 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 1875 | 1245 | Multi-Core | 8179 | 6654 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13300F is 3% better than Core i5-10400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 2 more core than Core i5-10400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10400 is better: 4 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300F and Intel Core i5-10400 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-10400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|