|
Intel Core i3-13300F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as VeraCrypt, MATLAB, 3DMark, 7zip, Blender, AIDA64, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Furmark, Blender, WPrime, Handbrake. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 1600X or Intel Core i3-13300F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300F | 59% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 53% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300F is 10% better than Ryzen 5 1600X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300F | 54% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 93.8 | Valorant | 109.5 | 106.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 59.7 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 100.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 80.0 | Overwatch | 88.7 | 86.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 73.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 53.3 | Warzone | 85.4 | 83.2 | Assassin's Creed | 92.0 | 89.6 | Valheim | 90.9 | 88.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300F | 96% |
Ryzen 5 1600X | 35% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300F is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 1600X as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 297 | 151 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 1126 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 480 | 389 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6360 | 2764 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1629 | 942 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18249 | 6470 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | Single-Core | 1492 | 2217 | Multi-Core | 31087 | 13041 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300F |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | Single-Core | 1875 | 1010 | Multi-Core | 8179 | 5730 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300F |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 11, 2017 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Summit Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 95 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 576KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 3MB | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD160XBCM6IAE
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 1600X is 16% better than Core i3-13300F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300F has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 1600X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300F is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is better: 5 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300F and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|