Comparisons 21-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Kirin 9000L or MediaTek Dimensity 8000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Kirin 9000L | 87% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Kirin 9000L | 94% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 88% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Kirin 9000L | 84% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Total score | 644858 | 777515 | | CPU | 216046 | 163368 | | GPU | 227655 | 139627 | | MEM | 126580 | 106600 | | UX | 107532 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Single-Core | 1018 | 1145 | | Multi-Core | 3529 | 4015 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | | Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2750 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 48 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 64 KB | | L2 cache | | 640 KB | | L3 cache | | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000L is 3% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP14 | Mali-G610 MP6 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 976 | 912 | | # of Cores | 24 | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 128 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Balong 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 13
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
