Comparisons 21-05-2022
Full testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 9000L or Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Kirin 9000L | 87% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Kirin 9000L | 94% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Kirin 9000L | 84% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000L |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | | Total score | 644858 | 1014839 | | CPU | 216046 | 268491 | | GPU | 227655 | 334895 | | MEM | 126580 | 153388 | | UX | 107532 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000L |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | | Single-Core | 1018 | 1415 | | Multi-Core | 3529 | 4462 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000L |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | | Frequency | 2860 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 88 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 1 MB | | L2 cache | | 2 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is 4% better than Kirin 9000L in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP14 | Adreno 730 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 976 | 1800 | | # of Cores | 24 | | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 128 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Balong 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NavIC enabled, GNSS, Beidou, Galileo, NavIC, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is better: 24
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
|
