Comparisons 21-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Geekbench 5, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Kirin 9000L or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Kirin 9000L | 87% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Kirin 9000L | 94% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 91% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Kirin 9000L | 84% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Total score | 644858 | 1021474 | | CPU | 216046 | 163368 | | GPU | 227655 | 139627 | | MEM | 126580 | 106600 | | UX | 107532 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Single-Core | 1018 | 1168 | | Multi-Core | 3529 | 4246 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000L |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | | Frequency | 2860 MHz | 3050 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | 8400 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 7500 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 52 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 128 KB | | L2 cache | | 1024 KB | | L3 cache | | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 6% better than Kirin 9000L in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP14 | Mali-G710 MC10 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz | | GFloPS | 976 | 1648 | | # of Cores | 24 | 10 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 128 MP | 320 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Balong 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
|
