Comparisons 10-07-2022
Detailed compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 or Kirin 9000L.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 99% |
Kirin 9000L | 87% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 89% |
Kirin 9000L | 94% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 97% |
Kirin 9000L | 84% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000L | | Total score | 1085878 | 644858 | | CPU | 268491 | 216046 | | GPU | 334895 | 227655 | | MEM | 153388 | 126580 | | UX | 139755 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000L | | Single-Core | 1514 | 1018 | | Multi-Core | 4774 | 3529 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000L | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2860 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is 10% better than Kirin 9000L in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 976 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 685 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GNSS, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou, GLONASS, NavIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000L is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
|
